Chip.de CHIP - Deutschlands Webseite Nr. 1 für Computer, Handy und Home Entertainment
News, Test & Kaufberatung zu PC, Computer, Handy und Home Entertainment.
chip.de Desktop Performance
73/100
These metrics represent real-world Chrome users experience viewing chip.de web page. Reports are focused on loading performance and other critical factors that most affect user experience. Follow our guide to track, optimize, and improve the quality of your web pages.
User Loading Experience
First Input Delay
Largest Contentful Paint
Cumulative Layout Shift
First Contentful Paint
Metrics
Speed Index59/100 2.1 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more.
Time to Interactive60/100 4.0 s
Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more.
Largest Contentful Paint70/100 1.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn More
Cumulative Layout Shift72/100 0.166
Cumulative Layout Shift measures the movement of visible elements within the viewport. Learn more.
Total Blocking Time80/100 200 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more.
First Contentful Paint94/100 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more.
Should Fix (15)
Opportunities
These suggestions can help your page load faster. They don't directly affect the Performance score.
Serve images in next-gen formats
Potential savings of 80 KiB
440 ms
Avoid multiple page redirects
Potential savings of 340 ms
340 ms
Remove unused JavaScript
Potential savings of 256 KiB
270 ms
Properly size images
Potential savings of 217 KiB
210 ms
Diagnostics
More information about the performance of your application. These numbers don't directly affect the Performance score.
Does not use passive listeners to improve scrolling performance
Avoid an excessive DOM size
2,474 elements
Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy
31 resources found
Minimize main-thread work
3.3 s
JavaScript execution time
1.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint element
1 element found
Avoid large layout shifts
5 elements found
Avoid chaining critical requests
3 chains found
Avoid long main-thread tasks
6 long tasks found
Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small
284 requests • 1,854 KiB
User Timing marks and measures
6 user timings
Passed Audits (15)
Avoids enormous network payloads
Total size was 1,854 KiB
Initial server response time was short
Root document took 440 ms
Remove unused CSS
Potential savings of 10 KiB
Preconnect to required origins
Efficiently encode images
Preload key requests
Minify JavaScript
Minify CSS
Avoids `document.write()`
Use video formats for animated content
Minimize third-party usage
Third-party code blocked the main thread for 70 ms
All text remains visible during webfont loads
Enable text compression
Potential savings of 25 KiB
Eliminate render-blocking resources
Defer offscreen images
Potential savings of 39 KiB
chip.de Desktop SEO
83/100
These checks ensure that your page is optimized for search engine results ranking. There are additional factors Lighthouse does not check that may affect your search ranking. Learn more. Run these additional validators on your site to check additional SEO best practices.
Should Fix (2)
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes
Passed Audits (10)
Page has successful HTTP status code
Document avoids plugins
robots.txt is valid
Document has a meta description
Document has a valid `hreflang`
Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`
Page isn’t blocked from indexing
Links have descriptive text
Document has a `<title>` element
Document has a valid `rel=canonical`
chip.de Desktop Best Practices
77/100
These checks highlight opportunities to improve the overall code health of chip.de page. Current recommendations will help to make your page fast and secure, to create a good user experience and to avoid deprecated technologies.
Should Fix (3)
Trust and Safety
Does not use HTTPS
1 insecure request found
Links to cross-origin destinations are unsafe
General
Browser errors were logged to the console
Passed Audits (11)
Page has the HTML doctype
Serves images with appropriate resolution
Avoids Application Cache
Detected JavaScript libraries
Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load
Properly defines charset
Avoids deprecated APIs
Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load
Avoids front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Allows users to paste into password fields
Displays images with correct aspect ratio
chip.de Desktop Progressive Web App
37/100
These checks validate the aspects of a Progressive Web App. Learn more. These checks are required by the baseline PWA Checklist but are not automatically checked by Lighthouse. They do not affect your score but it's important that you verify them manually.
Should Fix (6)
Installable
Does not use HTTPS
1 insecure request found
Does not register a service worker that controls page and `start_url`
Fast and reliable
`start_url` does not respond with a 200 when offline
Current page does not respond with a 200 when offline
Page load is not fast enough on mobile networks
Interactive on simulated mobile network at 20.4 s
PWA Optimized
Manifest doesn't have a maskable icon
Passed Audits (7)
Web app manifest meets the installability requirements
Provides a valid `apple-touch-icon`
Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`
Configured for a custom splash screen
Sets a theme color for the address bar.
Redirects HTTP traffic to HTTPS
Contains some content when JavaScript is not available
chip.de Desktop Accessibility
75/100
These checks highlight opportunities to improve the accessibility of your web app. Only a subset of accessibility issues can be automatically detected so manual testing is also encouraged. These items address areas which an automated testing tool cannot cover. Learn more in our guide on conducting an accessibility review.
Should Fix (6)
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Buttons do not have an accessible name
`<frame>` or `<iframe>` elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Some elements have a `[tabindex]` value greater than 0
Passed Audits (19)
`[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>`
`<html>` element has a valid value for its `[lang]` attribute
ARIA IDs are unique
Elements with an ARIA `[role]` that require children to contain a specific `[role]` have all required children.
`<video>` elements contain a `<track>` element with `[kind="description"]`
`[user-scalable="no"]` is not used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element and the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is not less than 5.
`[role]`s have all required `[aria-*]` attributes
Links have a discernible name
The page contains a heading, skip link, or landmark region
`[role]` values are valid
`[aria-hidden="true"]` elements do not contain focusable descendents
`<html>` element has a `[lang]` attribute
Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order
Document has a `<title>` element
List items (`<li>`) are contained within `<ul>` or `<ol>` parent elements
`[role]`s are contained by their required parent element
Lists contain only `<li>` elements and script supporting elements (`<script>` and `<template>`).
`[id]` attributes on active, focusable elements are unique
`<video>` elements contain a `<track>` element with `[kind="captions"]`
Desktop Speed
67/100
These checks analyze the performance of chip.de on desktop devices and return PageSpeed score and information on how to improve the load time. What makes a good Progressive Web App?
Should Fix (6)
Leverage browser caching
Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Optimize images
Reduce server response time
Minify JavaScript
Enable compression
Passed Audits (4)
Avoid landing page redirects
Minify CSS
Minify HTML
Prioritize visible content
www.chip.com
www.chip.net
www.chip.org
www.chip.info
www.chip.biz
www.chip.us
www.chip.mobi
www.hip.de
www.chip.de
www.xhip.de
www.cxhip.de
www.xchip.de
www.dhip.de
www.cdhip.de
www.dchip.de
www.fhip.de
www.cfhip.de
www.fchip.de
www.vhip.de
www.cvhip.de
www.vchip.de
www.cip.de
www.cbip.de
www.chbip.de
www.cbhip.de
www.cgip.de
www.chgip.de
www.cghip.de
www.cyip.de
www.chyip.de
www.cyhip.de
www.cuip.de
www.chuip.de
www.cuhip.de
www.cjip.de
www.chjip.de
www.cjhip.de
www.cnip.de
www.chnip.de
www.cnhip.de
www.chp.de
www.chup.de
www.chiup.de
www.chjp.de
www.chijp.de
www.chkp.de
www.chikp.de
www.chkip.de
www.chop.de
www.chiop.de
www.choip.de
www.chi.de
www.chio.de
www.chipo.de
www.chil.de
www.chipl.de
www.chilp.de
www.chip.net
www.chip.org
www.chip.info
www.chip.biz
www.chip.us
www.chip.mobi
www.hip.de
www.chip.de
www.xhip.de
www.cxhip.de
www.xchip.de
www.dhip.de
www.cdhip.de
www.dchip.de
www.fhip.de
www.cfhip.de
www.fchip.de
www.vhip.de
www.cvhip.de
www.vchip.de
www.cip.de
www.cbip.de
www.chbip.de
www.cbhip.de
www.cgip.de
www.chgip.de
www.cghip.de
www.cyip.de
www.chyip.de
www.cyhip.de
www.cuip.de
www.chuip.de
www.cuhip.de
www.cjip.de
www.chjip.de
www.cjhip.de
www.cnip.de
www.chnip.de
www.cnhip.de
www.chp.de
www.chup.de
www.chiup.de
www.chjp.de
www.chijp.de
www.chkp.de
www.chikp.de
www.chkip.de
www.chop.de
www.chiop.de
www.choip.de
www.chi.de
www.chio.de
www.chipo.de
www.chil.de
www.chipl.de
www.chilp.de